Why
is Oregon Special?
Policy on
controlled substances must
apply
to the entire nation
By Kenneth
R. Stevens, Jr.
The legal issue before the
U.S. Supreme Court isn't about
whether Oregon can permit assisted
suicide. It's about whether
a state can unilaterally exempt
itself from federal regulations.
The Controlled Substances Act
(CSA) mandates a uniform national
policy on prescribing controlled
drugs.
For decades, the CSA has forbidden
the use of certain addictive
and dangerous drugs for any
non-medical purpose. The CSA's
legislative history identified
suicides and drug-related deaths,
as well as recreational drug
uses, as a misuse of controlled
substances.
In November 2001, then U.S.
Attorney General John Ashcroft
stated that doctors who prescribe
these drugs could lose their
federal prescription licenses.
Nothing in the directive prevents
physicians from assisting suicides.
The directive applies only
to the use of federally controlled
drugs. It has no effect on
how states regulate the practice
of medicine. Doctors may still
prescribe any of thousands
of drugs that aren't federally
controlled.
In Oregon, it is barbiturates
(sleeping pills) and not pain
medications that are being
prescribed for the purpose
of assisted suicide.
Using controlled substances
for pain management has long
been recognized as a legitimate
medical purpose. Appropriate
pain management enhances life
and protects the terminally
ill during their greatest vulnerability.
Ashcroft pledged no increased
scrutiny of prescriptions to
control pain, "even when high
doses of painkilling drugs
are necessary and even when
dosages needed to control pain
may increase the risk of death."
The Supreme Court should uphold
the need for the government
to determine the use of federal
prescribing registrations.
Regardless of how that issue
is resolved, Oregon's law is
wrong. Physicians across the
nation can provide superlative
care of the seriously ill without
resorting to assisted suicide.
No other state has followed
Oregon in legalizing this practice.
To date, there have been no
documented cases of a lethal
overdose being prescribed because
of untreatable pain. It is
always for psychological and
social reasons such as fear
and depression.
Unfortunately, the Oregon
law allows depressed, frightened
and confused patients to be
given overdoses by a few misguided
doctors. We lament this unnecessary
loss of life.
Kenneth R. Stevens, M.D.,
is an oncologist in Portland,
Ore., and vice president of
Physicians for Compassionate
Care Education Foundation.
Published in USA TODAY, October
5, 2005, as an Editorial/Opinion
Debate article. |